Modeling of DC–DC Buck Converters for Large-Signal Frequency Response and Limit Cycles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A zeroth-order-hold equivalent discrete-time model of the buck converter for computing its large-signal frequency response is developed and experimentally verified. It is shown that, with a dc bias and a sinusoidal variation of the input duty cycle, the frequency response of the output voltage from the converter shifts from underdamped behavior to damped behavior with increasing amplitude of the input sinusoid. It is observed that, with a given dc input bias and a given input amplitude beyond the range of the state-space linearized small-signal model, the converter behavior varies from exclusively continuous inductor current mode at low frequencies to behavior with continuous and discontinuous inductor current modes at high frequencies. The use of this sinusoidal input large-signal frequency response in predicting limit cycles induced by feedback of the output voltage using proportional and integral controllers for such converters is studied. Experimental results confirming the use of this large-signal frequency response are presented
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it