RANTES Production by T Cells and CD8‐Mediated Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Gene Expression before Initiation of Potent Antiretroviral Therapy Predict Sustained Suppression of Viral Replication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A prospective blinded study was conducted to determine whether immunological differences exist between patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy who are able to achieve and maintain an undetectable virus load (<50 copies/mL) and those who are not. Eleven patients receiving protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy were studied for 1 year. After analysis of all baseline samples, patient virus load was disclosed, and patients were classified as suppressors (those who maintained undetectable virus load for 1 year) and nonsuppressors. Baseline virus load and CD4+ T cell count did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Levels of RANTES production by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD8-mediated inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gene expression before initiation of antiretroviral therapy were significantly associated with an undetectable virus load maintained for 1 year (P<.05). Thus, a functionally intact T cell-mediated immune system at the time of initiation of potent antiretroviral therapy may predict long-term virus suppression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".