Bioalteration of basaltic glass in the oceanic crust
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bioalteration of Quaternary to Early Cretaceous basaltic glass from pillow lavas of the upper oceanic crust can be documented in Deep Sea Drilling Project/Ocean Drilling Program (DSDP/ODP) samples from shallow to deep drill holes from the north to central Atlantic Ocean, Lau Basin, and Costa Rica Rift, a wide range of marine settings. Biogenerated textures are rooted in fractures and occur as two main types, a granular type and a tubular type. The granular type, common at all depths within the volcanic pile, appears as solid bands, semicircles or irregular patches of individual and/or coalesced spherical bodies, mostly 0.2–0.6 μm in diameter, with irregular protrusions into the fresh glass. The tubular type is more common at deeper levels in the crust and consists of thin tubes, sometime branching bodies, mostly 20–30 μm long and are more common at deeper levels. The upper crust displays a large variability in the relative importance of biotic to abiotic alteration, and the degree of bioalteration appears to decrease with depth. Thus the fraction of bioalteration of the total alteration of the glass ranges from 20–90% in the upper 300 m down to a maximum of 10% at about 500 m depth. This might be due to a natural variability in the abundance of bioaltered glass or to biased sampling from low drilling recovery of relatively young crust. The proportion of bioaltered to abiotically altered glass does not show any systematic variations with age of the crust. Thus bioalteration lasts as long as abiotic alteration, i.e., for as long as water is available to the hydration of the oceanic crust. Evidence from heat flow measurements suggests that hydrothermal circulation lasts until at least ∼70 Ma, and thus the deep biosphere is likely to expand at least into crust of this age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".