MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135703934 · doi:10.1079/wps200420

Immunological and biochemical properties of egg allergens

2004· article· en· W2135703934 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshinori Mine, Prithy Rupa

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld s Poultry Science Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunologyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food allergies or food intolerances affect nearly everyone at some point. “Food Allergy” refers to all interactions between molecules derived from the food supply and the immune system. Food allergies can be sub-divided into IgE (Immunoglobulin E) –mediated hypersensitivities and cell mediated hypersensitivities, but in most of the cases is IgE mediated. There has been an increased prevalence of food allergy reactions in the last decade. Approximately 2–3% of adults and 5–7% of children are affected by food allergy. Hen's egg is one of the most common causes of food allergic reactions, particularly in children. The prevalence of egg allergy is about 35% of food allergic children. It usually disappears by age five to seven years, but may sometimes be lifelong. Egg white, which is generally considered more allergenic than egg yolk, has four major allergenic proteins namely, ovomucoid (Gal d 1), ovalbumin (Gal d 2), ovotransferrin (Gal d 3), and lysozyme (Gal d 4) which are defined as immuno dominant proteins of egg white in egg allergic patients. Detailed characterization of the biochemical, immunological and structural properties of the major two allergens of the egg white, the ovalbumin and the ovomucoid have been studied. Studies of the B cell and T cell epitopes of these allergens have been summarized and mechanisms to reduce allergic reactions of these proteins at their molecular level has been evaluated in detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld s Poultry Science JournalSame topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207