MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135724251 · doi:10.1109/tns.2008.922815

Real Time Implementation of a Wiener Filter Based Crystal Identification Algorithm

2008· article· en· W2135724251 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Viscogliosi, Joël Riendeau, P. Bérard, Marc‐André Tétrault, Roch Lefebvre, Roger Lecomte, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyso-Avalanche photodiodeFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmPhysicsScintillatorSilicon photomultiplierOpticsEnergy (signal processing)PhotonWiener filterCrystal (programming language)Reconstruction algorithmComputer scienceIterative reconstructionArtificial intelligenceDetectorComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recently launched LabPETtrade, a small animal Avalanche PhotoDiode (APD)-based PET scanner with quasi-individual readout and massively parallel processing, makes it possible to acquire real-time information necessary for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) image reconstruction. Since each APD is coupled to an LYSO/LGSO phoswich scintillator pair, an efficient crystal identification algorithm must be developed to sustain real-time crystal feature extraction in high PET count rate. Furthermore, a less application specific algorithm is needed to easily expand its use to a large range of crystal materials. For these reasons, a new ultra-fast crystal identification algorithm based on a Wiener filter is proposed. This optimum filter instantly recovers crystal parameters by minimizing a linear cost function. A one-dimension projection based discrimination is used to identify the scintillating crystal. The algorithm achieves a discrimination rate of for low-energy X-ray photons ( keV) and up to for high energy 511 keV photopeak photons, with a maximum throughput of 10 Mevents/sec when implemented in a field programmable gate array.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207