MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2135740596 · doi:10.1080/07060660409507127

Mapping of a covered smut resistance gene in barley (<i>Hordeum vulgare</i>)

2004· article· en· W2135740596 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Tajinder S. Grewal, B. G. Rossnagel, G. J. Scoles

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaMinistry of Agriculture - SaskatchewanUniversity of SaskatchewanWashington State University
KeywordsSmutBiologyRAPDGenetic markerHordeum vulgareMolecular markerMarker-assisted selectionChromosomeGeneticsPopulationGeneBotanyPoaceaeGenetic diversity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covered smut of barley, caused by Ustilago hordei, is a seed-borne disease. Economic loss is due to decreased yield and to contamination of healthy grains with black teliospores. Molecular marker-assisted selection for covered smut is desirable, because traditional screening in the greenhouse and field is time consuming, expensive, and unreliable. The randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker OPJ10450, tightly linked to covered smut resistance in the barley line Q21861, was mapped to the short arm of chromosome 5 (1H) near the restrict fragment length polymorphic marker Act8A in the 'Harrington'/TR306 mapping population. The covered smut resistance gene in Q21861 was given the provisional designation of Ruhq. Sequence tagged site marker aHor2 and RAPD marker OPO6780 on the short arm of chromosome 5 (1H) were closely linked to Ruhq. The amplified fragment length polymorphic marker E-AAA/M-CCC265 was also linked to Ruhq. These markers will be useful for marker-assisted selection for covered smut resistance in barley.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207