Bibliographic record
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examined responses of the isolated cystic artery to 3 α-adrenoceptor agonists and the effects of 2 antagonists in relation to subjects’ blood pressures. Potency of the 3 amines studied was: α-methylnorepinephrine > norepinephrine > phenylephrine. Responses to clonidine were trivial (<5% of maximum) and remained <25% of maximum in the presence of sub-threshold concentrations of angiotensin II. A weak trend for increased potency of α-methylnorepinephrine was noted in arteries of subjects with higher blood pressures (r = 0.268, p = 0.027). There was no relationship between blood pressure and pA2 for yohimbine. The pA2 for prazosin could not be calculated because of a decline in maximal responses but prazosin was clearly more potent than yohimbine. The decline in maximal responses to norepinephrine and phenylephrine after prazosin treatment was related to subjects’ diastolic blood pressures (r = –0.400, p = 0.003). There were no significant relationships between these measurements of vascular responsiveness and a family history of hypertension. There were also no significant relationships betwen these measurements of vascular responsiveness and plasma norepinephrine levels, α2-adrenoceptor binding or platelets of β2-adrenoceptor binding of lymphocytes. The major postjunctional α-adrenoceptors in this artery are of the α1 type. The data suggest that differences in potency of α-adrenoceptor agonists in relation to blood pressure may be due to differences in the α2-adrenoceptor but are not likely due to a difference in binding to the receptor itself. The explanation for the effect of prazosin on maximal responses to α-adrenoceptor agonists in relationship to blood pressure in the present study requires further study. If the results in blood cell adrenoceptors are parallel to those in cystic artery, increased potency of α2-adrenoceptor agonists in the artery in subjects with higher blood pressure is not due to an increased number of adrenoceptors and therefore is most likely due to differences in postreceptor excitation-contraction coupling. Future experiments should utilize preparations such as subcutaneous resistance vessels where α2-adrenoceptors are more predominant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".