Fine-Scale Signatures of Molecular Evolution Reconcile Models of Indel-Associated Mutation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genomic structural alterations that vary within species, known as large copy number variants, represent an unanticipated and abundant source of genetic diversity that associates with variation in gene expression and susceptibility to disease. Even short insertions and deletions (indels) can exert important effects on genomes by locally increasing the mutation rate, with multiple mechanisms proposed to account for this pattern. To better understand how indels promote genome evolution, we demonstrate that the single nucleotide mutation rate is elevated in the vicinity of indels, with a resolution of tens of base pairs, for the two closely related nematode species Caenorhabditis remanei and C. sp. 23. In addition to indels being clustered with single nucleotide polymorphisms and fixed differences, we also show that transversion mutations are enriched in sequences that flank indels and that many indels associate with sequence repeats. These observations are compatible with a model that reconciles previously proposed mechanisms of indel-associated mutagenesis, implicating repeat sequences as a common driver of indel errors, which then recruit error-prone polymerases during DNA repair, resulting in a locally elevated single nucleotide mutation rate. The striking influence of indel variants on the molecular evolution of flanking sequences strengthens the emerging general view that mutations can induce further mutations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".