MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2135867317 · doi:10.4021//jmc.v2i4.221

Rapidly Progressive Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease VV1 Subtype

2011· article· en· W2135867317 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anuradha Kolluru, Alberto M. Jacir, Mamta Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrain biopsyPathologyDementiaDiseaseMagnetic resonance imagingEncephalopathyCreutzfeldt-Jakob SyndromeCentral nervous systemPersonality changesPrion proteinInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is rare transmissible spongiform encephalopathy caused by abnormal, host-encoded prion proteins that accumulate in the central nervous tissue. CJD occurs in 3 forms: sporadic, familial and acquired (iatrogenic and variant). Six different molecular subtypes (MM1, MM2, MV1, MV2, VV1, and VV2) of sporadic CJD (sCJD) have been identified by genotype at codon 129. The VV1 type represents one of the rarest subtyp es. In contrast to the classic sCJD types, these patients are characterized by young age at onset, and slowly progressive dementia. Our case illustrates that sCJD VV1 subtype can have a rapid progression. A 50 year old Caucasian presented with memory loss and personality changes. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed increased signal intensity in the grey mater of cerebral cortex. Brain biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of sCJD VV1 subtype. Currently there is no effective treatment and patient succumbed to death within 3 months of presentation.  doi:10.4021/jmc221w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding→French-language works237,207→