MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Secular evolution of viscous and self-gravitating circumstellar discs

2009· article· en· W2135876772 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversitySaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccretion (finance)PlanetGravitationViscosityGravitational collapseTurbulenceRotational symmetryCircumstellar diskProtostarBoundary value problem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We add the effect of turbulent viscosity via the α-prescription to models of the self-consistent formation and evolution of protostellar discs. Our models are non-axisymmetric and are carried out using the thin-disc approximation. Self-gravity plays an important role in the early evolution of a disc, and the later evolution is determined by the relative importance of gravitational and viscous torques. In the absence of viscous torques, a protostellar disc evolves into a self-regulated state with the Toomre parameter Q∼ 1.5− 2.0, non-axisymmetric structure diminishing with time and maximum disc-to-star mass ratio ξ= 0.14. We estimate an effective viscosity parameter αeff associated with gravitational torques at the inner boundary of our simulation to be in the range 10−4–10−3 during the late evolution. The addition of viscous torques with a low value α= 10−4 has little effect on the evolution, structure and accretion properties of the disc, and the self-regulated state is largely preserved. A sequence of increasing values of α results in the discs becoming more axisymmetric in structure, being more gravitationally stable, having greater accretion rates, larger sizes, shorter lifetimes and lower disc-to-star mass ratios. For α= 10−2, the model is viscous-dominated, and the self-regulated state largely disappears by late times. The axisymmetry and low surface density of this model may contrast with observations and pose problems for planet formation models. The use of α= 0.1 leads to very high disc accretion rates and rapid (within 2 Myr) depletion of the disc, and seems even less viable observationally. Furthermore, only the non-viscous-dominated models with low values of α= 10−4–10−3 can account for an early phase of quiescent low accretion rate (interspersed with accretion bursts) that can explain the recently observed Very Low luminosity Objects (VeLLOs). We also find that a modest increase in disc temperature caused by a stiffer barotropic equation of state (γ= 1.67) has little effect on the disc accretion properties averaged over many disc orbital periods (∼104 yr), but can substantially influence the instantaneous mass accretion rates, particularly in the early embedded phase of disc evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207