Modeling of low-cement extruded curb of concrete-faced rockfill dam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the key structure of a practical construction technique, the low-cement extruded curb has been widely used in recent concrete-faced rockfill dams (CFRDs). The extruded curb exhibits significant interactions with the neighboring gravels and with the face slab. These interactions were investigated using element tests, and a new model was proposed. This model is composed of three parts: (i) the equivalent slab that is described using an ideal elastoplasticity model, (ii) the equivalent interface between the curb and the gravel cushion layer that is described using an elastoplasticity damage model, and (iii) the interface between the curb and the face slab that is described using a modified ideal elastoplasticity model. This model was verified via a two-dimensional numerical simulation of an ideal CFRD to capture the main behavior of the extruded curb with interactions between the extruded curb and the neighboring soil – face slab, employing a significantly smaller number of elements and a shorter calculation than direct simulation. The model was used to perform a three-dimensional stress–displacement analysis of the Bakun CFRD (205 m in height), and the results showed that the extruded curb causes a change in the stress of the face slab.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".