Best path to best gateway scheme for multichannel multi-interface wireless mesh networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of optimal gateways selection and route selection to Internet in backbone wireless mesh networks (WMNs) where each mesh router (MR) is equipped with multiple radio interfaces and a subset of nodes serve as gateways to Internet. Several schemes have been proposed to route packets in WMNs or to select appropriate gateways to connect clients to Internet. However, most of these schemes consider packet loss, interferences, load at gateways, or ETX (Expected Transmission Count) as routing metrics; only a few schemes consider two some of these metrics at the same time. In this paper, we propose an efficient gateway and path selection scheme, called BP2BG (Best Path to Best Gateway), that takes into account load at gateways, ETX and interferences in order to select best path to best gateway. Simulation results show that BP2BG can significantly improve the overall network performance compared to schemes using either ETX, nearest gateway (i.e., shortest path to gateway), load at gateways or interferences as metrics for path and gateway selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".