Endothelin‐induced constriction of the ductus venosus in fetal sheep: developmental aspects and possible interaction with vasodilatory prostaglandin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. The ductus venosus is actively regulated in the fetus, but questions remain on the presence of a functional sphincter at its inlet. Using fetal sheep (0.6-0.7 gestation onwards), we have examined the morphology of the vessel and have also determined whether endothelin-1 (ET-1) qualifies as a natural constrictor being modulated by prostaglandins (PGs). 2. Masson's staining and alpha-actin immunohistochemistry showed a muscular, sphincter-like formation at the ductus inlet and a muscle layer within the wall of the vessel proper. This muscle cell component increased with age. 3. ET-1 contracted dose-dependently isolated sphincter and extrasphincter preparations of the ductus from term fetus. This ET-1 effect also occurred in the premature, but its threshold was higher. 4. BQ123 (1 microm) caused a rightward shift in the ET-1 dose-response curve, while indomethacin at a threshold concentration (28 nm) tended to have an opposite effect. 5. Big ET-1 also contracted the ductus sphincter but differed from ET-1 for its lesser potency and inhibition by phosphoramidon (50 microm). 6. The ductus sphincter (term and preterm) and extrasphincter (term) released 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) (hence PGI(2)) and, to a lesser degree, PGE(2) at rest and their release increased dose-dependently upon ET-1 treatment. Both basal and stimulated release was curtailed by endothelium removal. 7. BQ123 and phosphoramidon reduced slightly the contraction of ductus sphincter to indomethacin (2.8 microm). 8. We conclude that the ductus contains a contractile mechanism in the sphincter and extrasphincter regions. ET-1 lends itself to a role in the generation of contractile tone and its action may be modulated by prostaglandins.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".