MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1140918593
Altered expression of cell surface CD200 tolerance‐signaling molecule on human PBL stored at 4°C or 37°C correlates with reduced or increased efficacy in controlled trials of treatment of recurrent miscarriages

2006· article· en· W2135986333 on OpenAlexaff
Clark Da, Daljeet Banwatt

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Reproductive Immunology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive System and Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrologyFlow cytometryOdds ratioAbortionRandomized controlled trialMedicineFicollCellImmunologyMolecular biologyInternal medicineBiologyPregnancyIn vitroBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem: The CD200 molecule is required for prevention of abortions in mice by allogeneic lymphomyeloid cells bearing paternal antigen, and storage of at 4°C overnight causes loss of cell‐surface CD200 and loss of efficacy. Human PBL stored at 4°C overnight also lose CD200 and were ineffective in a randomized controlled trial RCT, odds ratio for live birth with stored cells = 0.55 (95% CI 0.27–1.14) versus 1.68 (95% CI 1.04–2.70) with freshly isolated PBL. A recent published RCT utilizing paternal PBL stored at 37°C overnight reported a dramatic reduction in abortion rate, odds ratio for live birth with treatment = 10.2 (95% CI 3.97–26.08). Does storage at 37°C increase expression of cell‐surface CD200? Methods: Hypaque‐ficoll‐purified human PBL were analysed by flow cytometry using PE‐anti‐huCD200 before and after storage in PBS for 18 hr at 4°C, 22°C, or 37°C. Results: Purified PBL stored at 4°C showed reduced expression of CD200, whereas at 37°C, CD200 expression was dramatically increased. Conclusions: The protective effect of paternal PBL against recurrent spontaneous abortion may be altered by storage conditions, and level of expression of cell‐surface CD200 appears to be a key correlate of efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Reproductive ImmunologySame topicReproductive System and PregnancyFrench-language works237,207