A Subnational Analysis of Japanese Direct Investment in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study examines longitudinal aspects of Japanese foreign direct investment in Canada. In looking at the longitudinal aspects, the focus was on a descriptive analysis of entry and exit rates and on an econometric analysis of the determinants of subsidiary survival and exit. In these analyses, we find that exit rates are related to subsidiary‐level variables such as business size, expatriate employment levels, equity‐ownership levels, and entry mode. The sector and region in which the investments are made is also related to subsidiary survival, with manufacturing‐sector subsidiaries located in Ontario being the least likely to exit. The results of our study suggest that region and industry interact, both to draw investment to a region and to influence the likeli‐hood of survival of foreign‐owned businesses. Further‐more, the focus on regional issues for Canada shows that even within a small open economy, subnational (interprovincial) variance can have important effects on the characteristics and performance of foreign direct investment. Résumé La présente étude porte sur l'évolution des investissements directs japonais à l'étranger, réalisés au Canada. De façon plus précise, cette recherche s'intéresse, sur une base longitudinale, à l'analyse descriptive des taux d'entrée et de sortie ainsi qu'à l'analyse économétrique des facteurs expliquant la survie ou la sortie de filiales japonaises. A la lumière de ces analyses, il ressort que les taux de sortie sont influencés par certaines caractéristiques des filiales telles que la taille, la proportion d'expatriés, la part du capital‐action et le mode d'entrée. Le secteur et la région où l'investissement s'effectue influencent également les chances de survie d'une filiale; la probabilité la plus faible de quitter le pays appartiendrait aux filiales manufacturières situées en Ontario. Les résultats de l'étude suggèrent que la région et l'industrie interagissent de façon à attirer les investissements dans une région donnée et à influencer les chances de survie de compagnies appartenant à des intérěts étrangers. Ces résultats sur les disparités régionales du Canada suggèrent que, měme à l'intérieur d'une économie de marché restreinte, la variance sous‐nationale (ou interprovinciale) peut avoir d'importantes répercussions sur les caractéristiques et la performance des investissements directs à l'étranger.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".