An initial assessment of genetic relationships among populations of<i>Fusarium circinatum</i>in different parts of the world
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fusarium circinatum Nirenberg & O'Donnell, the fungus responsible for pitch canker disease, is a destructive pathogen of Pinus spp. Pitch canker was first described in 1946 in the southeastern United States, and since 1987 has been reported in numerous other locations including California, Mexico, Japan, and South Africa. To make a preliminary assessment of relationships between populations of F. circinatum in these different locations, we compared allele and genotype frequencies based on eight polymorphic regions of DNA from 76 isolates of the fungus. Patterns of relatedness indicate that the California and Japanese populations of the fungus share lineages with the southeastern U.S.A. population. Genetic diversity is highest in Mexico, implicating it as the center of origin for the fungus. The association of multiple vegetative compatibility groups with a common multilocus genotype suggests that vegetative compatible group diversity may be generated by mutation, rather than through recombination resulting from sexual reproduction.Key words: genomic subtraction, tree disease, genetic distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".