Purification and Characterization of Brochocin A and Brochocin B(10-43), a Functional Fragment Generated by Heterologous Expression in <i>Carnobacterium piscicola</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brochothrix campestris ATCC 43754 produces a heat-stable, two-component, nonlantibiotic, class IIb bacteriocin, brochocin C (BrcC), that is active against a broad range of gram-positive bacteria, including spores of Clostridium botulinum. An improved purification method was developed for BrcC, in which n-butanol and chloroform extraction are used. Mass spectral characterization of the two components, brochocin A (BrcA) and brochocin B (BrcB), showed that both components are excreted into the medium by B. campestris as mature peptides consisting of 59 and 43 amino acids, respectively. Separate expression clones of BrcA and BrcB were constructed previously in Carnobacterium piscicola LV17C, but the products were not chemically characterized. Purification by the new protocol showed that BrcA is expressed as the mature 59-amino-acid peptide but that BrcB is produced by C. piscicola as a fragment, BrcB(10-43), which is cleaved at an internal Gly-Gly site. This fragment is not antimicrobial by itself, but in combination with BrcA it displays the full activity of the BrcC complex. Circular dichroism measurements revealed a high beta-sheet content in the secondary structure of both BrcA and BrcB(10-43), as well as in a 1:1 BrcA-BrcB(10-43) mixture. Separate expression clones of brcA and brcB were also constructed in Escherichia coli, but these clones only produced multiple fragments of the desired peptides with little or no activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".