Bioreducible hyperbranched polyglycerols with disulfide linkages: Synthesis and biocompatibility evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this article, we describe the development of multifunctional, water‐soluble hyperbranched polyglycerols containing redox‐sensitive disulfide linkages as a new class of biodegradable polymers. The polymers were synthesized by the anionic ring opening multibranching (co)polymerization of glycidol with an epoxide monomer bearing disulfide groups, 2‐((2‐oxiran‐2‐ylmethoxy)ethyl)disulfanyl) ethan‐1‐ol. Polymerizations were optimized at 65 °C unlike the homopolymerization of glycidol. Both low (5–10 kDa) and high (100 kDa) molecular weight polymers were synthesized in a controlled manner with low polydispersity. The polymers underwent degradation in presence of reducing agents such as tris(2‐carboxyethyl)phosphine, dithiothreitol, and glutathione resulting in low molecular weight fragments with thiol groups. Blood compatibility analysis using coagulation, platelet activation, complement activation and red blood cell lysis assays as well as cell toxicity analysis using MTS assay revealed the excellent biocompatibility of these newly synthesized polymer architectures. All these features make these polymers suitable for intracellular delivery of therapeutic molecules. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2015 , 53 , 2104–2115
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".