Gating pore currents and the resting state of Na <sub>v</sub> 1.4 voltage sensor domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mammalian voltage-gated sodium channels are composed of four homologous voltage sensor domains (VSDs; DI, DII, DIII, and DIV) in which their S4 segments contain a variable number of positively charged residues. We used single histidine (H) substitutions of these charged residues in the Na(v)1.4 channel to probe the positions of the S4 segments at hyperpolarized potentials. The substitutions led to the formation of gating pores that were detected as proton leak currents through the VSDs. The leak currents indicated that the mutated residues are accessible from both sides of the membrane. Leak currents of different magnitudes appeared in the DI/R1H, DII/R1H, and DIII/R2H mutants, suggesting that the resting state position of S4 varies depending on the domain. Here, DI/R1H indicates the first arginine R1, in domain DI, has been mutated to histidine. The single R1H, R2H, and R3H mutations in DIV did not produce appreciable proton currents, indicating that the VSDs had different topologies. A structural model of the resting states of the four VSDs of Na(v)1.4 relaxed in their membrane/solution environment using molecular dynamics simulations is proposed based on the recent Na(v)Ab sodium channel X-ray structure. The model shows that the hydrophobic septa that isolate the intracellular and the extracellular media within the DI, DII, and DIII VSDs are ∼2 Å long, similar to those of K(v) channels. However, the septum of DIV is longer, which prevents water molecules from hydrating the center of the VSD, thus breaking the proton conduction pathway. This structural model rationalizes the activation sequence of the different VSDs of the Na(v)1.4 channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".