Laser‐Activatible PLGA Microparticles for Image‐Guided Cancer Therapy In Vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(lactide‐co‐glycolic acid) (PLGA) particles are biocompatible and biodegradable, and can be used as a carrier for various chemotherapeutic drugs, imaging agents and targeting moieties. Micrometer‐sized PLGA particles were synthesized with gold nanoparticles and DiI dye within the PLGA shell, and perfluorohexane liquid (PFH) in the core. Upon laser irradiation, the PLGA shell absorbs the laser energy, activating the liquid core (liquid conversion to gas). The rapidly expanding gas is expelled from the particle, resulting in a microbubble; this violent process can cause damage to cells and tissue. Studies using cell cultures show that PLGA particles phagocytosed by single cells are consistently vaporized by laser energies of 90 mJ cm −2 , resulting in cell destruction. Rabbits with metastasized squamous carcinoma in the lymph nodes are then used to evaluate the anti‐cancer effects of these particles in the lymph nodes. After percutaneous injection of the particles and upon laser irradiation, through the process of optical droplet vaporization, ultrasound imaging shows a significant increase in contrast in comparison to the control. Histology and electron microscopy confirm damage with disrupted cells throughout the lymph nodes, which slows the tumor growth rate. This study shows that PLGA particles containing PFC liquids can be used as theranostic agents in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".