Toxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid to <i>Chironomus tentans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two perfluorinated surfactants, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), were evaluated for their toxicity to the aquatic midge, Chironomus tentans. Impetus for this laboratory study originated from a 10-d, in situ field assessment in which C. tentans was exposed to PFOS at concentrations ranging from 300 to 30,000 microg/L. No midges survived these exposures. Midge survival in a preliminary, acute 10-d laboratory test with nominal PFOS concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 100,000 microg/L showed similar toxicity with respect to survival (median lethal concentration [LC50], 45.2 microg/L) and growth (median effective concentration [EC50], 27.4 microg/L). A parallel test using PFOA indicated no significant impacts on survival or growth. A definitive 10-d assay with PFOS concentrations ranging from 1 to 150 microg/L produced an EC50 for growth (87.2+/-11.6 microg/L) of the same order of magnitude as that in the preliminary findings. The same was not true for survival, however, with the LC50 falling outside the range of test concentrations. To further investigate the sensitivity of C. tentans to PFOS, we conducted a chronic life-cycle test using a nominal concentration range of 1 to 100 microg/L. Three of the four endpoints measured-survival, growth, and emergence-were significantly affected, with EC50 values of 92.2+/-3.1, 93.8+/-2.6, and 94.5+/-3.2 microg/L, respectively. Reproduction was not affected by those PFOS concentrations at which females emerged. The results of the present study indicate that PFOS toxicity thresholds for C. tentans are as much as three orders of magnitude lower than those reported for other aquatic organisms but, at present, are approximately two orders of magnitude higher than those concentrations typically observed in aquatic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".