Gastric Mucosal Recognition of<i>Helicobacter pylori</i>Is Independent of Toll‐Like Receptor 4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is known about the interactions between Helicobacter pylori, which specializes in colonizing the mucin layer that covers the gastric mucosa, and primary gastric epithelial cells. The expression pattern of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in primary gastric epithelial cells and cell lines was compared. Primary cells did not express TLR4, whereas all cell lines expressed a nonsignaling form of TLR4. Because other cells within the mucosa expressed TLR4, it was next investigated whether H. pylori can be recognized by TLR4--they cannot. Moreover, H. pylori infection of primary cells induced a regulated production of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, whereas infection of cell lines only resulted in IL-8 production. The cytokine production in all cell types was strictly cag dependent. These findings indicate that, although the epithelium is important in directing the immune response against H. pylori infections, the response is independent of TLR4.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".