Differential expression of Rho1GTPase and Rho3GTPase during isotropic and polarized growth of Mucor circinelloides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evidence has been obtained that indicates the presence of small 22 kDa GTP-binding Rho proteins through ADP-ribosylation by Clostridium botulinum C3 exotoxin in Mucor circinelloides. Rho protein was detected at all stages of growth studied. During polarized growth, both under aerobic conditions and during the yeast-mycelia transition, the radiolabeling of the [32P]ADP-ribosylated protein increased when tube formation occurred and decreased as the hyphae branched. However, when Mucor grew isotropically, the Rho protein band was thick and its intensity did not vary significantly even after bud formation and separation of daughter cells. Crude extracts of yeast and mycelial cells exhibited a broad 22 kDa band of the [32P]ADP-ribosylated Rho protein that was resolved into a protein with a pI of 6.0, after two-dimensional electrophoresis, corresponding to the Rho1p homolog. Furthermore, [32P]ADP-ribosylated Rho protein from soluble and particulate extracts of multipolarized mycelial cells obtained from the yeast-mycelia transition was separated into two proteins with pI of 6.0 and 6.4, respectively, after two-dimensional electrophoresis. These correspond to the Rho1p and Rho3p homologs, respectively. Therefore, our results show that an increase in Rho accumulation is associated with polarized growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".