Chronic Treatment with Azide in Situ Leads to an Irreversible Loss of Cytochrome c Oxidase Activity via Holoenzyme Dissociation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chronic treatment of cultured cells with very low levels of azide (I(50)<10 microm) leads to slow (t(12) = 6 h), irreversible loss of cytochrome c oxidase (COX) activity. Azide-mediated COX losses were not accompanied by inhibition of other mitochondrial enzymes and were not dependent upon electron flux through oxidative phosphorylation. Although azide treatment also reduced activity (but not content) of both CuZn superoxide dismutase and catalase, a spectrum of pro-oxidants (and anti-oxidants) failed to mimic (or prevent) azide effects, arguing that losses in COX activity were not due to resultant compromises in free radical scavenging. Loss of COX activity was not attributable to reduced rates of mitochondrial protein synthesis or declines in either COX subunit mRNA or protein levels (COX I, II, IV). Co-incubation experiments using copper (CuCl(2), Cu-His) and copper chelators (neocuproine, bathocuproine) indicated that azide effects were not mediated by interactions with either Cu(A) or Cu(B). In contrast, difference spectroscopy and high performance liquid chromatography analyses demonstrated azide-induced losses in cytochrome aa(3) content although not to the same extent as catalytic activity. Differential azide effects on COX content relative to COX activity were confirmed using a refined inhibition time course in combination with blue native electrophoresis, and established that holoenzyme dissociation occurs subsequent to losses in catalytic activity. Collectively, these data suggest that COX deficiency can arise through enhanced holoenzyme dissociation, possibly through interactions with the structure or coordination of its heme moieties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".