MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136498501 · doi:10.1039/c2sc21307a

Redox-active, near-infrared dyes based on ‘Nindigo’ (indigo-N,N′-diarylimine) boron chelate complexes

2012· article· en· W2136498501 on OpenAlexafffund
Graeme Nawn, S.R. Oakley, Marek B. Majewski, Robert McDonald, Brian O. Patrick, Robin G. Hicks

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGenome British ColumbiaWestern Canada Research GridUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsChemistryRedoxChelationPhotochemistryElectrochemistryIndigoBoronInfraredSolventRing (chemistry)Inorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactions of indigo-N,N′-diarylimine (‘Nindigo’) derivatives with BF3·Et2O give mono- or bis-BF2 chelate complexes 2 or 3 respectively. The product distribution between 2 and 3 is sensitive to the auxiliary base and solvent. Although the bis-BF2 complexes 3 are isolable, they gradually decompose in solution to the corresponding mono-BF2 species 2; this process is accelerated by water. The instability of 3 is believed to be due to ring stain effects based on structural analyses of 2. Electrochemical studies of 2 reveal one quasi-reversible oxidation process and two irreversible reductions, whereas derivatives of 3 possess a reversible oxidation and two sequential reversible reductions. The electronic spectra of 2 and 3 contain intense (ε ∼ 3 × 104 M−1 cm−1) long-wavelength absorptions near 650 nm and 750 nm respectively. Both series of compounds are weakly emissive in the near-infrared. Time-dependent DFT calculations reveal the electronic transitions to be π–π* in nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical ScienceSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207