Measurement properties of the Frenchay Activities Index among individuals with a lower limb amputation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the original and a modified version of the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) among individuals with a lower limb amputation. DESIGN: Two week test-retest design. SETTING: South Western Ontario Amputee Program, London, Ontario, Canada. SUBJECTS: Consecutive sample of 84 individuals, primarily men (78.6%), mean age 56.5 years with a unilateral transtibial (71.4%) or transfemoral amputation related to traumatic (59.5%) or vascular causes. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects completed a questionnaire containing the FAI and other scales, the 2-minute walk and timed up and go tests during a regularly scheduled clinic visit. Fifty-five subjects completed a second FAI which was mailed to them two weeks later. Twenty-nine others completed the second FAI upon return for testing related to another project. MAIN MEASURES: FAI, Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Scale, 2-minute walk, timed up and go and walking device aid use. RESULTS: Relative reliability for the FAI (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.79) and FAI-18 (ICC = 0.78) was acceptable, however bias between measurements was detected. Hypothesized relationships (p < 0.001) between both FAI versions and the Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire-Mobility Scale, 2-minute walk and timed up and go test were observed. Significant group differences were observed for amputation cause, mobility device use, age and years as an amputee. Neither version distinguished between amputee level or gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: The original and modified FAI are valid and reliable tools for unilateral amputees. Reliability is adequate to detect group but not individual level differences. Additional FAI-18 items did not substantially improve the ability to detect between-amputation-group differences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it