Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueNature Genetics · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesBiocenter, University of OuluMünchner Zentrum für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthErasmus Universiteit RotterdamEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentZonMwRaine Medical Research FoundationBritish Heart FoundationScottish GovernmentHealthwayErasmus Medisch CentrumUniversity of BristolOulun YliopistoEuropean CommissionFogarty International CenterJuvenile Diabetes Research Foundation InternationalDiabetes UKCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchRoyal SocietyBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Health and Medical Research CouncilChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekWellcome Trust
KeywordsBirth weightBiologyGenome-wide association studySingle-nucleotide polymorphismLow birth weightPregnancyGenetic associationGeneticsAlleleDemographyGeneGenotype
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
