<i>FUSE</i>Observations of the Loop I/Local Bubble Interaction Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used the FUSE ( Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer ) satellite to observe O VI emission along two sight lines toward the edge of the interaction zone (IZ) between the Loop I superbubble and the Local Bubble. One sight line was chosen because material in the interaction zone blocks distant X-ray emission, and should thus do the same for nonlocal O VI emission. We measured an O VI intensity of I shad = 2750 ± 550 photons cm −2 s −1 sr −1 along this "shadowed" sight line, and I unshad = 10,800 ± 1200 photons cm −2 s −1 sr −1 along the other sight line. Given these results, very little (≲ 800 photons cm −2 s −1 sr −1 ) of the emission arises from the near side of the interaction zone, which likely has an H I column density of about 4 × 10 20 cm −2 along the "shadowed" sight line. The O VI emission arising within Loop I (~10 4 photons cm −2 s −1 sr −1 ) is probably associated with gas of n e ∼ 0.1 cm −3 and an emitting path length of ~2.5 pc, suggesting it arises at interfaces rather than from gas filling Loop I. In contrast, the C III emission is similar along both sight lines, indicating that much of the emission likely arises on the near side of the interaction zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".