Delineating Potential Control Mechanisms of Mammary Protein Synthesis Utilizing Atropine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amino acids (AA) and/or somatotropin (ST) were infused into a jugular vein of lactating cows receiving atropine to determine the effect on milk protein secretion. Atropine decreased milk protein yield by 35%. Plasma alpha-amino nitrogen, which was decreased by 31% due to atropine, was restored to control levels upon AA infusion. Plasma ST concentration was not affected by atropine and, upon ST infusion, increased by 236% in treated animals. Amino acids, ST, or the combination of the two were unable to return milk protein to control levels in atropine-treated animals. Plasma insulin concentration decreased by 37% in atropine-treated animals and was not significantly different for cows receiving atropine as well as ST, AA, or both ST and AA. Similarly, glucagon decreased by 36% in atropine-treated animals but was partially restored in cows receiving AA. Overall, the insulin-to-glucagon ratio was not significantly affected by treatment. Plasma glucose concentration was not affected by treatment. These data lend support to the importance of the insulin-to-glucagon ratio in terms of whole-body metabolism, with the exception of the mammary glands, which are glucagon-insensitive and, therefore, sensitive to the observed decrease in circulating insulin concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".