IL-15–Dependent Upregulation of GITR on CD8 Memory Phenotype T Cells in the Bone Marrow Relative to Spleen and Lymph Node Suggests the Bone Marrow as a Site of Superior Bioavailability of IL-15
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CD8 memory T cells are enriched in the bone marrow, a site where these cells are thought to receive homeostatic signals. However, the primary site where CD8 memory T cells receive their cytokine-induced homeostatic signals has recently come under debate. In this study, we demonstrate that the bone marrow contains a fraction of CD8 memory phenotype T cells with elevated expression of glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR). In contrast, splenic and lymph node memory phenotype T cells have GITR levels similar to those on naive T cells. The bone marrow GITR(hi) memory T cells have a phenotype indicative of cytokine activation, with higher CD122 and lower CD127 than do the GITR(basal) memory T cells. Remarkably, these bone marrow-specific GITR(hi) cells are almost completely ablated in the absence of IL-15, whereas TNFR2 and 4-1BB expression on the CD8 memory T cells are IL-15 independent. Furthermore, adoptively transferred splenic CD8 memory phenotype T cells show IL-15-dependent GITR upregulation upon entry into the bone marrow. This result implies that the selective appearance of GITR(hi) memory phenotype T cells in the bone marrow reflects the local microenvironment rather than a different subset of memory T cells. GITR(-/-) mice have a lower frequency of CD8 memory phenotype cells in the bone marrow, yet the GITR(-/-) cells hyperproliferate compared with those in wild-type mice. Taken together, these data suggest that GITR plays a role in the survival of CD8 memory phenotype T cells and that GITR upregulation represents a precise marker of cells that have responded to IL-15.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".