MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136772194 · doi:10.1002/nbm.1349

Absolute metabolite concentrations calibrated using the total water signal in brain <sup>1</sup>H MRS

2008· article· en· W2136772194 on OpenAlexaff
Elana Brief, Rachel Moll, D. K. B. Li, Alex L. MacKay

Bibliographic record

VenueNMR in Biomedicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite matterChemistryMetaboliteNuclear magnetic resonanceT2 relaxationVoxelMagnetic resonance imagingAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsChromatographyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) has been coupled with a multi-echo imaging sequence to determine the relaxation corrected signal areas of the metabolites and the tissue water. Stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) spectra (TE/TM/TR 30/13.7/5000 ms) acquired from gray and white matter voxels in 43 healthy volunteers were fit using LCModel. Corresponding water signals, measured using a multi-echo T(2) imaging sequence, were fit with a Non-Negative Least Squares algorithm. Using this approach the water area could be T(1) and T(2) corrected for all three water compartments: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), intra- and extra-cellular water, and myelin water. The image-based water measurement is an improvement over spectroscopy methods because it can be more sensitive to water changes in diseased tissue. Metabolite areas were also corrected for relaxation losses. In occipital gray matter, the concentrations of Cho, Cr, and N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) were 1.27 (0.06), 8.9 (0.3), and 9.3 (0.3) mmol/L tissue, respectively and in parietal white matter they were 1.90 (0.05), 7.9 (0.2), and 9.8 (0.2) mmol/L tissue. The Cho and Cr concentrations were different in occipital gray compared to parietal white matter (p < 0.0001 and <0.005, respectively).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNMR in BiomedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207