Burst regimes of long-period irregular pulsations at frequencies of 2.0–6.0 mHz and substorm activity in the nightside magnetosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of studying the simultaneous observations of burst regimes of long-period irregular pulsations at frequencies of 2.0–6.0 mHz (the series of ipcl bursts) in the region of the dayside polar cusp and magnetic field disturbances in the nightside auroral oval are presented. The data on the magnetic field at Mirny (MIR, Φ = 76.93°; Λ = 122.92°) and Yellowknife (YKC, Φ = 69.94°; Λ = 294.38°) antipodal observatories as well as the AE index values ( http://www.cetp.ipsl.fr/~isgi/homepag1.htm ) have been used in an analysis. It has been found out that 87% (group I) and 13% (group II) of events were registered against a back-ground of substorm activity and a quiet nightside magnetosphere, respectively. It has been revealed that several morphological characteristics of the group-I and -II ipcl bursts differ depending on the conditions in the nightside magnetosphere. It has been indicated that the intervals between peaks and the amplitudes of ipcl bursts of both types are distributed according to the exponential and power laws. The results indicate that magnetospheric plasma turbulence develops in the region where burst regimes are formed. It is assumed that the substorm processes in the magnetotail manifest themselves in plasma turbulence in the dayside cusp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".