The associations between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), ventricular dyssynchrony, and ventricular interaction in heart failure patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Ventricular interactions may be mediated by loading conditions and biventricular timing and coordination. We sought to understand the relationships between right (RV) and left ventricular (LV) function and dyssynchrony, examine the RV correlates of LV dyssynchrony, and determine whether improved loading conditions affect inter-ventricular interaction. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 25 heart failure patients [15 with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%; 10 with LVEF >/= 50%], Doppler echocardiography and invasive bi-ventricular pressure-volume haemodynamics were obtained at baseline and 30 min after infusion of the recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide vasodilator nesiritide. RV and LV intra-ventricular dyssynchrony was measured invasively using a pressure-conductance catheter. Patients with reduced LVEF had greater LV dyssynchrony (31 +/- 3 vs. 24 +/- 7%; P = 0.003) compared to those with preserved LVEF. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) had the highest correlation with LV dyssynchrony (r = -0.52; P = 0.0002) compared to other RV echocardiographic parameters. The association between TAPSE and LV dyssynchrony was independent of RVEF and LVEF (P = 0.008). There were no acute changes in the correlations between LV dyssynchrony and TAPSE after nesiritide. CONCLUSION: TAPSE and LV dyssynchrony are strongly associated, independent of RV and LV ejection fraction. Of the RV echocardiographic parameters, TAPSE has the highest predictive value of LV dyssynchrony, and remained significant after vasodilator unloading.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".