MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136897631 · doi:10.1086/341508

Long‐Term Follow‐up of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Children of Different Ethnic Origins

2002· article· en· W2136897631 on OpenAlexaffabout
George Marx, Steven R. Martin, Jean-François Chicoine, Fernando Álvarez

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeroconversionHBeAgMedicineHepatitis B virusTransmission (telecommunications)DemographyNatural historyHepatitis BPediatricsImmunologyVirologyVirusInternal medicineHBsAg

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The natural history of chronic hepatitis B in children is influenced by mode of transmission and varies with regional endemicity. Seroconversion rates were studied in 174 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive children who were of different ethnic origins and living in Canada. Overall, 40.2% became anti-HBeAg positive, and 8.6% were hepatitis B surface-antigen positive during a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Spontaneous seroconversion rates were lower in Asian-born, mainly vertically infected, children, versus those born either in Canada or where horizontal transmission predominates (24% vs. 44%, P=.015). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the cumulative persistence of HBeAg after 13 years was 25% in Asian-born children, versus 6% in all others (P<.05). Treatment of 27 children accelerated seroconversion by 3 years, without influencing the proportion seroconverting over time. Thus, although Asian-born children seroconvert more slowly, a large proportion will seroconvert before adulthood. Because treatment appears to accelerate anti-HBe seroconversion, longitudinal studies are required in order to assess the long-term benefits of early treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207