MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136898928 · doi:10.1080/15376520490446392

Toxicokinetic Modeling of Parathion and its Metabolites in Humans for the Determination of Biological Reference Values

2004· article· en· W2136898928 on OpenAlexaff
Nathalie Gosselin, Michèle Bouchard, Robert C. Brunet, Marie–Josée Dumoulin, Gaétan Carrier

Bibliographic record

VenueToxicology Mechanisms and Methods · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsToxicokineticsParathionPharmacologyChemistryToxicologyEnvironmental chemistryMedicineBiologyPesticidePharmacokinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A multi-compartment kinetic model was developed to describe the kinetics of parathion and its metabolites, p-nitrophenol (p-NP) and alkyl phosphates (AP), in order to assess worker exposure and health risks. Model compartments represent body burdens and excreta of parathion and its metabolites; to minimize the number of compartments and free parameters, regrouping was carried out on the basis of the time scales of the kinetic processes involved. Burden variations in time were described mathematically by differential equations that ensure conservation of mass on a mole basis. Model parameter values were determined from statistical fits to published in vivo kinetic data in humans. Except for the dermal absorption fraction and absorption rate, which are known to be subject to wide intra- and inter-individual variability, a single set of parameter values for the internal body kinetics enabled the model to simulate accurately the available kinetic data. For dermal exposure to parathion, with a typical absorption rate of 0.085 h(-1), model simulations show that it takes 20 h to recover half of the total amounts of p-NP eventually excreted in urine and 30 h for the AP. The model can be used to estimate the dose of parathion absorbed under different exposure routes and temporal scenarios, based on measurements of amounts of metabolites accumulated in urine over given time periods. Using the above dose-excreta links and the human no-observed-effect level for parathion reported in the literature for the inhibition of cholinesterase activities, biological reference values are proposed in the form of specific amounts of urinary metabolites excreted over chosen time periods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.285
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToxicology Mechanisms and MethodsSame topicPesticide Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207