Excessive Apoptosis in Patellar Tendinopathy in Athletes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of tendon overuse injuries is poorly understood. The histopathology underlying tendinopathy at various anatomical locations is similar and may reflect a common pathologic process. HYPOTHESIS: Apoptosis contributes to the pathophysiology in patellar tendinopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We compared biopsy specimens from the patellar tendon in patients with patellar tendinopathy diagnosed clinically and with typical magnetic resonance image findings with biopsy specimens from a control group without any previous or current knee complaints to suggest patellar tendinopathy. The presence of apoptosis was examined with immunohistochemical methods using a polyclonal antibody recognizing active caspase-3, confirmed by labeling DNA strand breaks (F7-26 antibody) and nuclear morphology (fragmentation and condensation). RESULTS: The number of apoptotic cells per unit area (4.5 mm(2)) was 0.91 +/- 0.81 (SD) in tendinopathic samples and 0.21 +/- 0.21 in controls (P = .026). Although the tendinopathic samples displayed increased cellularity (average 162.5 nuclei/mm(2) vs 98.9 nuclei/mm(2)), the apoptotic index was higher (0.42% vs 0.17%, P = .014). CONCLUSION: Increased apoptotic cell death is a feature of patellar tendinosis. The role of apoptosis within the broader framework and time course of tendon overuse injury remains to be established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it