MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2136960109 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0424

Dose-dependent optical properties and laser damage of helium-implanted sapphire

2014· article· en· W2136960109 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mian Zhong, Liang Yang, Guixia Yang, Zhonghua Yan, Zhijie Li, Wanguo Zheng, Xiaodong Yuan, Decheng Guo, Jin Huang, Xia Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIon-surface interactions and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluenceIrradiationIon implantationPhotoluminescenceSapphireLaserMaterials scienceInfraredAbsorption (acoustics)HeliumIonMicrostructureOpticsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsOptoelectronicsPhysicsChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of single crystalline Al 2 O 3 samples are implanted with He + ions at different nominal fluences up to 1 × 10 18 ions/cm 2 at room temperature. The microstructure evolution and optical properties as well as laser-induced damage threshold are investigated. Optical microscopic images show that the density and amount of defects increase with increasing implantation fluence. In addition, atomic force microscopic images indicate that the surface morphologies have changed distinctly when the fluence reaches 5 × 10 17 ions/cm 2 and above. After helium implantation, broad purple and green–yellow absorption bands as well as an obvious photoluminescence band at 330 nm are observed, respectively. With the increase of implantation fluence, the intensities of absorption bands increase greatly, whereas the intensity of the photoluminescence band decreases and tends to saturation. The original strong infrared band shifts and broadens with increasing implantation fluence. The mechanism for the shift and broadening of the infrared band is discussed. After laser irradiation, it is found that the implantation fluence has great effect on the laser-induced damage threshold, which decreases significantly from 5.43 J/cm 2 to 4.62, 3.71, 2.64, and 1.80 J/cm 2 with increasing implantation fluence. A mechanism for the degradation of laser damage resistance is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicIon-surface interactions and analysisFrench-language works237,207