Mid–Late Ordovician magmatism and metamorphism along the Gander margin in central Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fieldwork coupled with U–Pb dating has clarified the relationships between the Exploits and Gander-derived rocks in central Newfoundland during the Mid-Ordovician opening of the Exploits back-arc basin, reinforcing correlation across the peri-Gondwanan segments of the Appalachian–Caledonian orogen. We have separated a new back-arc-related unit, the Red Cross Group, from the arc-related Victoria Lake Supergroup. This group includes 466 ± 3 Ma felsic volcanic rock interlayered with alkali basalt–enriched mid-ocean ridge basalt, 457 ± 6 Ma gabbro, Llanvirn–Caradoc normal mid-ocean ridge basalt–island arc tholeite, limestone, black shale and mélange. Locally the Red Cross Group is in parautochthonous contact with low-grade Gander psammite. This contact was overrun by the Meelpaeg Metamorphic Nappe during the Devonian. The nappe contains Gander metapsammite (Meelpaeg Subzone) and the coticule-bearing Howley Waters Complex (Exploits), which hosts 467 ± 3 Ma felsic porphyry. The Gander and Exploits metasediments in the nappe are stitched by Arenig–Llanvirn granite (467 ± 6 Ma and 468 +3.5/−3 Ma) and Caradoc intrusions (458 ± 3 Ma and 454 ± 2 Ma). Metamorphic monazite (462 ± 1 Ma) and titanite (460 ± 3 Ma) from the nearby Mount Cormack Subzone (Gander) indicate the coeval formation of a low-pressure–high-temperature metamorphic dome. The widespread presence of Caradoc magmatism suggests that the width of the back-arc basin remained relatively narrow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".