Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are reasons to feel that he might be. Eunomia, after all, is a woman. Literally a 'good social order', which Solon lauds as straightening crooked judgments and stopping the works of factional strife, the title of Allott's extraordinary book 1 is also the name of one of the three daughters of Zeus (chief of the gods) and Themis (tribal law). 2 But there is more than this. Allott's profoundly reasoned message -that human society is a product of human imagination and sense of possibility -is one that resonates for many feminists. As a methodological matter, almost all feminist legal theorists share his social constructionist stance. In feminist legal theory, this is manifested in the view that the meaning and power of sex/gender 3 come from culture, not nature, and that gender relations are therefore open to revision through the reform of important social institutions such as law. 4 Similarly, Allott writes in Eunomia that the international system is 'nothing other than a structure of ideas', 5 thereby exhorting us, feminists included, to interrogate international law at this deep ideational level because such an interrogation can bring about fundamental change. 6 However, any intuition that Allott is a feminist or, at least, that there is an affinity or potential alliance between his project and a feminist project, must contend with his silence about women. In The Health of Nations, Allott's most recent book, a work of over 400 pages on the need for a global revolution of ideas aimed at remaking all of 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it