MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137055997 · doi:10.1093/genetics/156.2.579

Suppression of the Profilin-Deficient Phenotype by the RHO2 Signaling Pathway in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

2000· article· en· W2137055997 on OpenAlexaff
Nathaly Marcoux, Simon Cloutier, E. I. Zakrzewska, P. M. Charest, Yves Bourbonnais, Dominick Pallotta

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyProfilinSaccharomyces cerevisiaeActinActin cytoskeletonCell biologyPhenotypeCytoskeletonSuppressorGeneticsCellGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Profilin plays an important role in actin organization in all eukaryotic cells through mechanisms that are still poorly understood. We had previously shown that Mid2p, a transmembrane protein and a potential cell wall sensor, is an effective multicopy suppressor of the profilin-deficient phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To better understand the role of Mid2p in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton, we isolated five additional multicopy suppressors of pfy1Delta cells that are Rom1p, Rom2p, Rho2p, Smy1p, and the previously uncharacterized protein Syp1p. The problems of caffeine and NaCl sensitivity, growth defects at 30 degrees and 37 degrees, the accumulation of intracellular vesicular structures, and a random budding pattern in pfy1Delta cells are corrected by all the suppressors tested. This is accompanied by a partial repolarization of the cortical actin patches without the formation of visible actin cables. The overexpression of Mid2p, Rom2p, and Syp1p, but not the overexpression of Rho2p and Smy1p, results in an abnormally thick cell wall in wild-type and pfy1Delta cells. Since none of the suppressors, except Rho2p, can correct the phenotype of the pfy1-111/rho2Delta strain, we propose a model in which the suppressors act through the Rho2p signaling pathway to repolarize cortical actin patches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneticsSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207