Intrauterine abstinence syndrome (IAS) during buprenorphine inductions and methadone tapers: can we assure the safety of the fetus?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An intrauterine abstinence syndrome (IAS) is a potentially fatal consequence of maternal opiate withdrawal. This study reviews the evidence for this syndrome. Withdrawal also creates an adverse environment for the developing fetal brain that can have long-term health effects. Effective methadone treatment eliminates risks of fetal withdrawal. However, concerns about neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in methadone-exposed neonates have resulted in efforts to withdraw women from methadone during pregnancy or to use buprenorphine, a mixed agonist/antagonist opiate in place of methadone. Both approaches necessarily expose the fetus to either acute or chronic withdrawal. Routine fetal monitoring is not able to detect such symptoms, unless they are life-threatening. Therefore, the safety of the fetus during buprenorphine inductions or methadone tapers cannot be assured and the fetus should be protected from such procedures. Further research into methods of diagnosing IAS and its developmental consequences is needed to assure that attempts to reduce NAS do not harm the fetus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".