MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137185980 · doi:10.7202/008559ar

Le bilinguisme législatif et la place de la traduction1

2004· article· fr· W2137185980 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Judith Lavoie

Bibliographic record

VenueTTR traduction terminologie rédaction · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le bilinguisme législatif a entraîné, au Canada, une forte présence de la traduction. Le texte de loi est souvent polysémique et hermétique, comportant dès lors son lot d’embûches pour le traducteur. Afin de pallier toute difficulté d’interprétation, la communauté juridique s’est dotée d’un principe fondamental, la règle d’égale autorité. Selon cette règle, les deux versions d’une loi ont le même statut, la même valeur. Or plusieurs juristes ont formulé de nombreuses critiques à l’endroit de la traduction. Ce qui a entraîné l’avènement de la corédaction des lois fédérales, qui a eu pour résultat d’évincer la traduction du processus législatif. L’objet du présent article sera, d’une part, de mettre au jour ces critiques et, d’autre part, de montrer la contradiction présente au sein de la communauté juridique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTTR traduction terminologie rédactionSame topiclinguistics and terminology studiesFrench-language works237,207