Patient-Specific Radiation Dosimetry of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-HYNIC-Tyr<sup>3</sup>-Octreotide in Neuroendocrine Tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: (99m)Tc-hydrazinonicotinamide-Tyr(3)-octreotide ((99m)Tc-HYNIC-TOC) is increasingly gaining acceptance as a new radiopharmaceutical for the diagnosis of pathologic lesions overexpressing somatostatin receptors. However, little information has been published about the radiation dosimetry of this agent. The aim of this study was to assess the biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of commercially available (99m)Tc-HYNIC-TOC. A dose calculation procedure designed to be feasible to implement in a busy clinical environment was used. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients were imaged for suspected neuroendocrine tumors using a series of whole-body planar, dynamic planar, and SPECT/CT studies, after injection with (99m)Tc-HYNIC-TOC. Patient-specific dosimetry was performed using the OLINDA/EXM software with time-integrated activity coefficients estimated from a hybrid planar/SPECT technique. A phantom experiment was performed to establish adaptive thresholds for determination of source region volumes and activities. RESULTS: Pathologic uptake, diagnosed as due to neuroendocrine tumors, was observed in 12 patients. Normal organs with significant uptake included the kidneys, liver, and spleen. The mean effective dose after (99m)Tc-HYNIC-TOC injection was 4.6 ± 1.1 mSv. Average normal-organ doses were 0.030 ± 0.012, 0.021 ± 0.007, and 0.012 ± 0.005 mGy/MBq for the spleen, kidneys, and liver, respectively. The interpatient kidney dose ranged from 0.011 to 0.039 mGy/MBq, whereas the range of tumor doses varied from 0.003 to 0.053 mGy/MBq. The ratio of tumor to kidney dose ranged from 0.13 to 2.9. The optimal thresholds for recovery of true activity in the phantom study were significantly lower than those used for volume determination. CONCLUSION: The patient-specific 3-dimensional dosimetry protocol used in this study is a clinically feasible technique that has been applied to demonstrate large dose variations in tumors and normal organs between patients imaged with (99m)Tc-HYNIC-TOC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".