MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137242749 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.92

Online Routing of Stochastically Arriving Bundles in Delay Tolerant Networks

2007· article· en· W2137242749 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel C. Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBundleComputer scienceComputer networkNode (physics)Distributed computingRouting (electronic design automation)The InternetNetwork packetRouting protocolEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Future networks will expand current capabilities to service "outpost" regions in performance-challenging environments, in which link connectivity is intermittent, propagation delay may be extremely long, and/or communication conditions may be hostile. In such performance-challenging environments, a network is likely to be partitioned most of the time, and the message delivery mechanisms must have an opportune series of link-by-link transmittals from source to destination. The current Internet suite of protocols is less than adequate for networking in such performance-challenging environments, and new architecture and protocols, based on bundle transport, are being considered. A bundle is a message unit larger than a packet; it comprises a set of data that is sufficiently useful or meaningful to the application without additional data. In this paper, we focus on the online routing decision for a system in which bundle arrival times and bundle sizes are stochastic. We also model the time-varying link rates by stochastic processes. Then, we present an approach to "online" bundle routing based on "offline" traffic engineering. In this approach, we pre-compute nominal traffic flows based on the average available transmission rates of all links and the average rates of offered traffic for all source-destination node pairs. Then, online routing decisions are made on the basis of the nominal flows computed offline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207