The Antenna Current Green's Function Formalism—Part II
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main focus in Part II is on understanding the interrelations between the three modes of operations defined in Part I. Using a field reciprocity theorem, we prove that the receiving mode characteristics (Mode C) can be given fully in terms of suitable transmitting mode data (Mode A). We then utilize a theory of the antenna near field developed recently by the authors to analyze the relations between Mode A and Mode B on one hand, and Mode B and Mode C on another hand. The final outcomes of these investigations include the explication of the general interaction mechanisms between two objects placed in the near-field zone of each others. It turns out that simple geometrical transformations, rotations and/or translations plays prominent role in the manner in which electromagnetic interactions take place. Our methods generalize and extend the conventional network theory, which was developed originally using temporal Fourier techniques, but this time taking into account the spatial structure of the antennas and devices operational within the system and the manner in which they interact with the spectral components of the signals injected and circulating within them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it