Socially desirable responding does moderate personality scale validity both in experimental and in nonexperimental contexts.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'influence de la reponse socialement desirable sur la validite de la personnalite autodeclaree est examinee dans trois etudes portant sur 1 056 participants, des dimensions de la personnalite a cinq modeles factoriels et une mesure solide sur le plan psychometrique de la conduite strategique des relations. Les resultats indiquent que le trucage induit de facon experimentale genere des effets moderateurs de la validite extremement forts pour la conduite strategique des relations, mais que de tels effets sont modifies, tout en restant substantiels et importants, pour les variations qui se produisent naturellement dans les reponses socialement desirables. Des niveaux attenues d'importance pour la reponse socialement desirable se produisant naturellement en tant que moderateur peuvent etre lies a un manque de validite du concept pour la mesure de la conduite strategique des relations et a la reduction de l'efficacite statistique en raison de la petite taille de l'echantillon. L'auteur conclut que le rejet de la reponse socialement desirable en tant qu'enjeu pour la validite de la dimension de la personnalite autodeclaree est premature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it