A Study On Transnational Enterprise Faces Cultural Difference and Trans-Culture Management Under Economic Globalization Background
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trans-Culture and multicultural are Multinational corporation’s essential feature that distinguish between ordinary enterprise, they are also enterprise carries on trans-national operations and foreign direct investment environment and condition. Along with the 21st century economic globalization rapidly development, the world economics depend on each other degree to deepen day by day mutually, specially Multinational corporation which take market integration, trade globalization, financial internationalization, production trans-national, economical network and so on as characteristic rapidly development, caused the global economic relation each other close degree sharp growth, conformity, transformation, remould the global production, management, circulation various active way, world economics which became is worthy of reputation global economic. What follows comes, economical and cultural relation is also widespread day by day. Trans-national operations develop around world quickly, when the enterprise carries on investment and management at host country which has different cultural, cultural difference will bring many influences to enterprise's trans-national operations and management. Therefore, how to overcome negative effect which cultural difference brings, is also trans-national enterprise faces huge challenge and difficult problems. Multinational corporation want to reduce adverse effect which brings by cultural difference, it must construct own Trans-Culture management tactics by globalized field of vision. Key words: Multinational Corporation; Culture; Cultural difference; Trans-Culture ManagementResume: Transculturel et multiculturel sont les caracteristiques essentielles des societes multinationales qui se distinguent des entreprises ordinaires. Ils sont aussi des entreprises qui exercent des activites transnationales et fontcionnent dans un environnement des investissements directs etrangers. Au fur et a mesure du developpement rapide de globalisation economique du 21eme siecle, le degre de dependance mutuelle de l'economie mondiale s'approfondit de jour en jour, et en particulier les societes multinationales qui impliquent l'integration des marches, la mondialisation des echanges, l'internationalisation financiere, la production transnationale, le reseau economique et ainsi de suite. Le developpement rapide a renforce les relations entre les sujets economiques dans la mondialisation, la conformite, la transformation, et remodele la production mondiale, la gestion et la circulation de maniere active. L'economie mondiale est devenue digne de la reputation de l'economie globale. Ce qui suit est l'extension des relations economiques et culturelles au jour le jour. Les operations transnationales se developpent tres rapidement dans le monde, lorsque l'entreprise exerce des investissements et de la gestion dans le pays hote qui a des differences culturelles. Ces differences culturelles apporteront de nombreuses influences sur les operations transnationales et la gestion des entreprises. Par consequent, la facon de surmonter les effets negatifs lies aux differences culturelles est un grand challenge et un gros probleme auxquels les entreprises transnationales devraient faire face.Si les societes multinationales veulent reduire l'effet indesirable entraine par la difference culturelle, elles doivent construire leurs propres tactiques de gestion transculturelles avec un champ de vision mondialisee.Mots-Cles: societe multinationale; culture; difference culturelle; management transculturel
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".