Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) Protects Primary Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells from Apoptosis through LPA Receptor Activation of the Anti-apoptotic Protein AKT/PKB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) protects epithelial and fibroblast cell lines from apoptosis. In B-cells, LPA acts as a growth factor promoting cell proliferation. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the accumulation of CD19+/CD5+ B-lymphocytes primarily through a block in apoptosis. The mechanisms underlying this defect are not fully understood. We investigated whether LPA could be a survival factor in CLL cells. Herein, we demonstrate that LPA protects B-cell lines BJAB and I-83 and primary CLL cells but not normal B-cells from fludarabine- and etoposide-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, LPA prevented spontaneous apoptosis in primary CLL cells. The LPA1 expression was found to be increased in primary CLL cells compared with normal B-cells correlating with LPA prevention of apoptosis. Treatment of primary CLL cells with the LPA receptor antagonist, diacylglycerol pyrophosphate, reverses the protective effect of LPA against apoptosis, and down-regulation of the LPA1 by siRNA blocked LPA-mediated protection against spontaneous apoptosis in primary CLL cells. The protective effect of LPA was inhibited by blocking activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway. These results indicate that LPA is a survival factor in B-cell lines and primary CLL cells but not normal B-cells. Thus, drugs targeting the LPA receptors might be an effective therapy against B-cell-derived malignancies such as CLL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".