Lysophosphatidic Acid (LPA) Protects Primary Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells from Apoptosis through LPA Receptor Activation of the Anti-apoptotic Protein AKT/PKB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) protects epithelial and fibroblast cell lines from apoptosis. In B-cells, LPA acts as a growth factor promoting cell proliferation. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by the accumulation of CD19+/CD5+ B-lymphocytes primarily through a block in apoptosis. The mechanisms underlying this defect are not fully understood. We investigated whether LPA could be a survival factor in CLL cells. Herein, we demonstrate that LPA protects B-cell lines BJAB and I-83 and primary CLL cells but not normal B-cells from fludarabine- and etoposide-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, LPA prevented spontaneous apoptosis in primary CLL cells. The LPA1 expression was found to be increased in primary CLL cells compared with normal B-cells correlating with LPA prevention of apoptosis. Treatment of primary CLL cells with the LPA receptor antagonist, diacylglycerol pyrophosphate, reverses the protective effect of LPA against apoptosis, and down-regulation of the LPA1 by siRNA blocked LPA-mediated protection against spontaneous apoptosis in primary CLL cells. The protective effect of LPA was inhibited by blocking activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway. These results indicate that LPA is a survival factor in B-cell lines and primary CLL cells but not normal B-cells. Thus, drugs targeting the LPA receptors might be an effective therapy against B-cell-derived malignancies such as CLL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".