Activators of the PKA and PKG pathways attenuate RhoA-mediated suppression of the K<sub>DR</sub> current in cerebral arteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study tested whether activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and G (PKG) pathways would attenuate the ability of RhoA to suppress the delayed rectifier K(+) (K(DR)) current and limit agonist-induced depolarization and constriction. Smooth muscle cells from rat cerebral arteries were enzymatically isolated, and whole cell K(DR) currents were monitored with conventional patch-clamp electrophysiology. The K(DR) current averaged 21.2 +/- 2.3 pA/pF (mean +/- SE) at +40 mV and was potently inhibited by UTP. Current suppression was eliminated in the presence of C3 exoenzyme, confirming that this modulation is dependent on RhoA. Activation of PKA (dibutyryl-cAMP, forskolin) or PKG (dibutyryl-cGMP, sodium nitroprusside, nitric oxide) similarly abolished the ability of UTP to suppress K(DR) and did so without effect on baseline current. Using pressure myography techniques, we stripped cerebral arteries of endothelium and preconstricted them with UTP; these were subsequently shown to hyperpolarize and dilate to both forskolin and sodium nitroprusside. An increase in K(V) channel activity was found to partly underlie these associated changes, as constriction to 4-aminopyridine (K(DR) channel blocker) was greater after PKA or PKG activation. We conclude from our electrophysiological and functional observations that the PKA and PKG pathways attenuate the ability of UTP to depolarize and constrict cerebral arteries in part by minimizing the RhoA-mediated suppression of the K(DR) current.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".