MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2137679015 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a82621

A case of NMO seropositive for aquaporin-4 antibody more than 10 years before onset

2009· article· en· W2137679015 on OpenAlexaff
Shuhei Nishiyama, Tatsuya Ito, Tatsuro Misu, Toshiyuki Takahashi, Akiko Kikuchi, Naoki Suzuki, Kazutaka Jin, Masashi Aoki, K. Fujihara, Yasuto Itoyama

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromyelitis opticaAntibodyAquaporin 4MedicineImmunologyVirologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is characterized by severe optic neuritis and longitudinally extended transverse myelitis (LETM). The clinical and laboratory features of NMO are different from multiple sclerosis (MS).1 An autoantibody to aquaporin-4 (AQP4) has been detected exclusively in the NMO sera.1 Moreover, we demonstrated an extensive loss of AQP4 and glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivities in the perivascular regions with complement and immunoglobulin deposition in NMO that suggests astrocytic impairment. However, when AQP4 antibody is produced in patients with NMO is unknown, and thus it remains unresolved whether there are long-term asymptomatic AQP4 antibody–positive carriers, whether AQP4 antibody alone can be pathogenic, and whether AQP4 antibody is produced secondarily as a result of tissue destruction in attacks of NMO. We herein report a case of NMO in which AQP4 antibody was detected years before the NMO onset. ### Case report. A 34-year-old healthy woman without previous history of inflammatory or neurologic diseases noticed temporary skin eruptions on her chest and shoulders in June 2007. A dermatologist made the diagnosis of eczema. Three weeks later, when the skin eruptions subsided, she noted progressive paresthesia in the chest and toes. Within a few days, she could not walk well due to right leg weakness, and then she was hospitalized. Neurologic examination on …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207